Research

Most of today's defining management challenges are, at heart, problems of time. AI compresses the time available to organizations to adapt to digital change. Sustainability commitments extend the horizon of responsibility beyond any CEO's tenure. Geopolitical shocks shatter the past as a reliable template for the future. What makes the temporal dimension especially acute in today’s world is that organizations must reconcile demands that pull in opposite directions: stability and fluidity, continuity and innovation, speed and reflexivity, short-term responsiveness and long-term responsibility.

A temporal lens is therefore central to my work. I treat time not as a neutral backdrop to organizing but as a core dimension through which organizations coordinate, innovate, compete, and endure. My lens makes visible what I call organizational Eigenzeit: the particular time each organization enacts through its routines, rhythms, and horizons. Its practical counterpart is temporal design: the deliberate shaping of how organizations pace, sequence, and allocate time, as well as how they interrelate distant and near futures to make them actionable in the present. For leaders, temporal design offers a vocabulary for seeing—and ultimately transforming—the rhythms that silently chart their organizations' trajectories in time.

I currently pursue a series of research projects with regard to three societal and technological transformations that are marked by acute temporal tensions: the AI-driven acceleration of organizational processes, the sustainability transition in sectors such as food, mobility, and energy, and the management of deep uncertainty in domains like climate risk insurance and digital disruption. Each of these three transformations destabilizes existing temporal assumptions and patterns differently, bringing the politics and practices of temporal design into sharp relief. Methodologically, I work primarily with interpretive and process-oriented approaches, such as ethnography and longitudinal case studies, that do justice to lived experience and unfolding change. Through this work, I aim to contribute both to contemporary academic debates and broader conversations about how organizations can act responsibly and reflexively in an age of crisis and complexity.

Over the course of the last two decades, I have thus developed substantial expertise on the following topics: organizational change · organizational design · organizational development · change management · innovation ecosystems · social innovation · sustainable innovation · sustainability transitions · temporal design · time management · time horizons · strategic foresight · strategic change · flexible work · hybrid work · part-time work · new ways of working · future of work · digitalization · digital transformation · acceleration · AI and organizations.

  • Organizations face multiple competing temporal demands: they must act with urgency while strategizing for the long term or respond to immediate pressures while preparing for an uncertain future. My research explores how organizations make sense of and actively manage these tensions, what I call temporal complexity. For example, I study how sustainable startups balance their long-term vision with the need to scale quickly, or how teams resist harmful acceleration in favor of more reflexive, purposeful pacing. This work highlights temporal design as a critical leadership capacity in the age of polycrisis.

  • Organizations frequently create work environments that undermine both their own declared goals and the wellbeing of their members: digitally mediated, seductive, and always-on settings in which constant availability becomes expected, overwork normalized, and the boundaries between work and life increasingly porous. My research examines how such working time regimes emerge, why they prove so tenacious, and what it would take to change them. For example, I study why excessive working hours — from sixty-hour weeks in professional services to 120-hour weeks in investment banking — persist despite mounting evidence of their costs for health, families, gender equality, and long-term productivity, and why individual, organizational, and regulatory countermeasures so often fail. This work reframes working time as a contested and negotiated organizational regime, constituted at multiple levels of analysis and in need of deliberate design.

  • What does it take for organizations to become ecologically and socially sustainable? My research examines how organizations translate ambitious sustainability goals into everyday practices, often while facing economic pressures to deliver short-term results. I explore how leaders and teams navigate the tensions between future-oriented transformation and historical path dependence, and how sustainability initiatives are shaped by digital technologies and their implementation. This includes studying how digital technologies support or undermine sustainability transitions, and how organizations can manage sustainability without simply reinforcing the status quo. The goal is to better understand what it takes to make sustainability both actionable and transformative in complex organizational settings.

  • Technologies like artificial intelligence, simulation models, and video-conferencing are reshaping how we collaborate and strategize. I investigate how these technologies influence organizational communication, knowledge-based practices, risk work, and power relations in organizations. My research shows how digital technologies are inscribed with hidden assumptions that shape decision-making and accountability, while also reconfiguring the rhythmic and relational fabric of organizational life. For instance, the shift to hybrid or remote work alters not only how people experience connectivity but can also reinforce existing power asymmetries. This line of research helps organizations to better understand the “people side” of new and emerging technologies, and how to approach them in a ethical and reflexive way.

  • From agile teams to online communities and coworking spaces, many organizations are experimenting with alternative or decentralized, less-hierarchical forms of organizing. My research explores how these forms of organizing influence collaboration and wellbeing at work. I examine, for instance, how agile teams manage competing priorities over time and how coworking spaces function as semi-informal “surrogate” organizations that blend community with subtle forms of discipline and control. My studies show that new organizational forms can afford flexibility and creativity, but also bring hidden costs, such as overwork or informal hierarchies.

  • Innovation is central not only to how organizations adapt and renew themselves, but also how they address the pressing social and technological challenges of our time, from digital transformation to sustainability transitions. Yet managing innovation is far from straightforward: it requires organizations to break with established routines while drawing on accumulated knowledge, and to coordinate distributed activities across social, spatial and temporal boundaries. My research examines how organizations navigate these challenges, with particular attention to the temporal dimensions that shape innovation processes. For example, I study how actors leverage pacing and timing to advance new ideas, navigating the tension between speed-based regimes of acceleration, such as innovation accelerators, hackathons, and agile methods, and emerging counter-movements around "slow innovation" that emphasize reflection, learning, and care. This work reframes innovation not as a linear pipeline or a singular breakthrough, but as an ongoing, distributed process in which organizational pasts, presents, and futures are continually reinterpreted, and in which managing the rhythms and horizons of innovation becomes a core strategic task.